← Selected work
Work
Enablement & Training

Product & Dashboard Training

Anatomy first, then each feature as what it is and why it matters.

TrainingProduct AdoptionDocumentation

Sanitized for publication. Company names, customer identities, and proprietary figures have been removed.

01

Purpose

Large accounts adopted a product whose feature set had grown faster than anyone's ability to explain it. Staff needed a single training artifact that covered everything, in an order that matched how a real user moves through the interface.

02

The problem

Feature documentation was organized by internal structure, which meant training sessions jumped between unrelated areas and staff left with a list rather than a mental model. Adoption of the more valuable features was low, not because people disliked them but because nobody had ever put them in context.

03

The thinking

  • Start with anatomy. Show the whole map before touring any single room.
  • Describe every feature twice: what it is, and why anyone should care. The second half is the part that gets remembered.
  • Order by user journey, not by menu structure. Quick actions and check-in come before profile settings because that is the real sequence.
  • Name the constraints honestly. Fields that cannot be edited in the app should be flagged, or the training creates its own support tickets.
  • Keep each feature to one page so the deck doubles as a reference after the session.
04

What was created

  1. 01

    A product anatomy map

    The full feature set grouped into progress, rewards, quick actions, identity, and profile, presented as one page before anything was explained in detail.

  2. 02

    A what it is and benefits pattern

    A consistent two-part treatment for every feature, so the training explained value rather than mechanics alone.

  3. 03

    Journey-ordered sequencing

    Features taught in the order a member meets them, starting with entry and check-in and ending with settings and support.

  4. 04

    Known-limitation callouts

    Explicit notes where data is owned by an upstream system, including what a customer must do instead.

05

Selected artifacts

Figure 01 — One feature per page
ONE SCREEN, ONE STEP, ONE INSTRUCTION01Entry02Sign up03Set up04Verify05DoneWRITTEN FOR SOMEONE HOLDING A PHONE IN FRONT OF A WAITING CUSTOMER.
The repeating unit of the training: a single state, what it is, and why it is worth using.

Shared framework · The same structure also supports Staff & Member Enablement Guides and User Acceptance Testing Program.

Figure 02 — What training is actually for
ADOPTION IS NOT ENGAGEMENTRegisteredEveryone on the listDownloadedInstalled the thingSigned inCleared setupActive in periodThe honest numberActive weeklyHabit formingREPORT THE NARROW END. THE WIDE END FLATTERS EVERYONE AND CHANGES NOTHING.
Training moves people down this funnel. Its success is measured at the narrow end, not at distribution.

Shared framework · The same structure also supports Adoption & Engagement Analysis.

06

What it informed

  • Gave account teams one artifact that worked as both a live session and a later reference.
  • Raised awareness of the features that drove engagement rather than the ones that were easiest to demo.
  • Established the anatomy-first pattern I still use when introducing any system to a team.
07

Reflection

The best decision was refusing to teach features in menu order. The weakest part was that the training assumed a single audience. Managers and front line staff needed different depths, and one deck for both meant each got a version slightly wrong for them.

08

Related work