Purpose
High-touch outreach was being handled case by case, which made it generous, inconsistent, and impossible to evaluate. The charter existed so a program of this kind could be run deliberately and judged honestly.
The problem
Without a defined population, the list grew by advocacy rather than by criteria. Without a ceiling, cost was discovered afterward. Without an owner per stage, follow-through depended on whoever felt responsible. And without a measure, the program could neither be defended nor retired.
The thinking
- Write the objective as one measurable sentence before deciding what to offer.
- Define the population by criteria that can be queried, including who is deliberately excluded.
- State the ceiling in advance. A program without a ceiling is a budget conversation waiting to happen at the worst moment.
- Name an owner per stage, because the handoff between selection, outreach, fulfillment, and follow-up is where these programs quietly stall.
- Keep a risk register with a mitigation next to each entry, including the awkward ones about perceived favoritism.
- Decide the measure up front, then actually re-measure the recipients afterward.
What was created
- 01
A program charter
Objective, population, offer, owners, risks, and measures on a single page, agreed before the first outreach went out.
- 02
A qualification standard
Query-able criteria for inclusion and explicit exclusions, so the list could be reproduced rather than assembled by memory.
- 03
A risk register
Named risks including cost creep, perception of favoritism, fulfillment failure, and the recipient who does not want the attention, each with a defined mitigation.
- 04
An outcome measure
Acceptance, completion, and a follow-up sentiment read, so the program could be judged on effect rather than on volume sent.
Selected artifacts
Key decisions
- 01
Exclusions written down, not implied
The uncomfortable half of the criteria is the half that protects the program. An unwritten exclusion becomes an inconsistency the first time someone senior asks for an addition.
- 02
Follow-up measurement is part of the program
Sending is not the outcome. If nobody checks whether sentiment moved, the program is a gesture with a shipping cost.
What it informed
- Gave high-touch outreach a repeatable shape that survived a change of owner.
- Set the charter format later reused for other one-off programs.
- Supported the proactive upgrade outreach run during the remediation program.
Reflection
The most useful section was the risk register, which is the section people most want to skip. Writing down the failure modes in advance made it much easier to say no later without it feeling personal.
Related work
- Customer OperationsAdvocacy & Sentiment Operations →
Turning public reviews, ratings, and open-text feedback into coded reasons, counted themes, and assigned owners.
- Customer OperationsPartner Feedback Operating Log →
A single log that turns scattered field and partner feedback into rows with a topic, an owner, a priority, and a state, reviewed on a fixed cadence.

